| Bersih wants Siva out of Suhakam | ||||
|
||||
Elections watchdog Bersih today called for the resignation of Suhakam commissioner N Siva Subramaniam for defending the violation of human rights by the police force at a mass gathering last Saturday.In a press conference held in the parliament lobby today, Bersih committee members said that Siva acted out of his duty as a human rights commissioner by justifying the police action in subduing protesters at the rally. DAP MP for Seputeh Teresa Kok, reading out from a media statement, said that not only the commissioner has failed to defend the right of citizens to peacefully assemble, but had also told the press that the police only moved to quell the protest when the crowd got rowdy.
“More shocking is that Siva had told New Straits Times yesterday that the police did not use violence to control the crowd and that they have acted professionally on the matter,” said Kok. “Siva is either completely incompetent or utterly dishonest to make such a statement. He has brought further shame to Suhakam which has failed to investigate the police shooting in the gathering at Batu Buruk in Terengganu.”
The Bersih-organised rally saw some 40,000 people taking to the streets and the submission of a memorandum to the King calling for electoral reform. Shocking and disappointing Meanwhile, Suaram executive director Yap Swee Seng said that Siva’s statement was shocking and disappointing.
“His statement has also deviated from the mandate of Suhakam to protect and promote human rights. In that sense, Siva should resign from his position as a Suhakam commissioner,” he added. Yap said that Siva should visit the victims hospitalised to see for himself if the police had used excessive violence.
Suhakam deputy chairperson Simon Sipaun, when contacted, however said that the statement made by Siva was on an individual basis and did not represent the rights body’s view. Abu Talib was unavailable for comments. Police statement tomorrow At the same press conference today, commenting on Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s statement that the opposition was dragging the royalty into opposition politics, PAS central committee member Dr Syed Azman Syed Ahmad said the members of the public has every right to complaint to the king as he is the ruler of the country. “We don’t intend to drag the royalty into this, but if the Election Commission and the police refused to listen to our qualms, where else can we go?” asked Syed Azman.
Meanwhile opposition leaders and Bersih committee members Ronnie Liu, Salahuddin Ayub, R Sivarasa and Syed Azman will be meeting an officer from the Bukit Aman’s commercial crime department on Thursday to give their statement over a police report lodged against Bersih. On Nov 3, the committee members received a call informing them that a police report had been lodged by an individual in Setapak about Bersih’s status as an illegal organisation. They were supposed to have meet the police officer yesterday but the meeting was cancelled. SPECIAL REPORT: Bersih mass protest |
DAP MP for Seputeh Teresa Kok, reading out from a media statement, said that not only the commissioner has failed to defend the right of citizens to peacefully assemble, but had also told the press that the police only moved to quell the protest when the crowd got rowdy.
Kok also rebutted claims that the gathering was illegal. She cited the federal constitution which allowed for every citizen to peacefully assemble without arms.
“There is abundance of evidence documented by the international media, which showed the violence committed by the police on that day. I don’t know how Siva can say that the police did not commit violence in handling the crowd,” he said at the same press conference.
When contacted from comment, Siva refused to say anything further on the matter, saying that the commissioners’ meeting have decided that all matters pertaining to the rally must be spoken through Suhakam chairperson Abu Talib Othman.
Syed Azman also said that Bersih’s steering committee has declared Saturdays to be its ‘yellow wave day’.
净选盟今午在国会走廊召开记者会,
当一众记者
人民之声执行主任叶瑞生(右图)在记者会上谴责马来西亚人权委员会委员西华苏巴马廉(Siva Subramaniam)昨天对媒体表示,警方没有使用暴力的说法。叶瑞生认为西华的说法与事实不符,且违背了人权委员会捍卫人权的立场。
November 14, 2007 at 9:11 am |
2007年11月12日版本
吉隆坡非法集會
總警長:不聽勸破壞秩序
警方依法驅散示威者
GuangMing Daily
updated:2007-11-12 18:57:57 MYT
(吉隆坡訊)全國總警長丹斯里慕沙哈山說,警方在上週六採取行動對付非法集會參與者是依法辦事,因為警方在行動前曾勸告參與者離開,可是參與者不但不聽勸告,並且破壞社會秩序,警方必須維護社會安寧而採取行動。
他指出,警方是在集會出現暴亂時才開始展開行動,參與者不但挑戰警方,甚至造成多間商店無法營業及交通混亂,警方不能袖手旁觀,只好依據法律程序辦事。
慕沙哈山是於週一見證全國副總警長丹斯里那吉移交職權給新任此職的拿督依斯邁後披露,非法集會者罔顧法紀影響社會安寧,這是公眾人士不想看到的一幕,而警方必須採取行動維持秩序。
調查集會召集人
“目前警方在調查非法集會的召集人,他們已被傳召錄取口供,但是他們至今沒有出現。”
警方正在調查干淨與公平選舉聯盟(Bersih)的6名召集人,分別是人民公正黨副主席西華拉沙、宣傳主任蔡添強、青年團執委左哈里阿都及最高理事會委員凱魯安華、民主行動黨全國中委劉天球以及回教黨副主席莫哈末沙布。警方在上週六傳召他們,但他們並沒理會,而警方再一次傳召他們週一(12日)前往商業罪案調查組總部錄口供。
“警方知道怎樣做,如果他們再不出現,警方會依法辦事。”
有記者問慕沙哈山,上週六非法集會參與者是否會似登嘉樓州暴亂事件般,仿傚該州警方的做法時,他不願回答有關問題。
另一方面,慕沙哈山感謝那吉為警隊作出貢獻,並讚揚對方在任職期間為警隊付出許多,他希望所有警官給予新任全國副總警長拿督依斯邁的支持與合作,全心全意為警隊效力。(TSI)
攜孩子參與
家長將被控
全國總警長丹斯里慕沙哈山說,警方在上週六萬人大集會上,也發現一些身為家長的參與者,竟攜帶孩子共同參與非法集會,他們根本沒有顧及孩子的安全,這些家長可在兒童保護法令下被控。
此外,他也解釋,警方當天在市內的多處路段設障檢查車輛,是避免參與者攜帶危險武器,所以造成嚴重交通堵塞並不是警方引起,罪魁禍首是非法集會參與者。 (光明日報•2007.11.12)
November 14, 2007 at 9:16 am |
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
BERSIH Gathering: Police blockades and use of force unnecessary
Malaysian Bar Council
____________________________________
No. 13, 15 & 17, Leboh Pasar Besar, 50050 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Tel: 03-2031 3003 (Hunting Line) Fax: 03-2034 2825, 2026 1313, 2072 5818
E-mail: council@malaysianbar.org.my
Website: http://www.malaysianbar.org.my
——————————————————————————–
PRESS STATEMENT
BERSIH Gathering: Police blockades and use of force unnecessary
The Bar Council sent a team of 40 lawyers to monitor the BERSIH gathering on 10 November 2007.
The gathering despite being attended by tens of thousands, was disciplined and peaceful contrary to recent statements by Ministers and the Inspector-General of Police. It proves once again that Malaysian citizens are rational and responsible people capable of exercising their rights of expression and assembly with mature restraint.
There were nevertheless several worrying features in the conduct of the police:
The large number of police personnel deployed to man blockades, to inspect and detain vehicles and persons, and further to prevent persons from entering the city to join the gathering was unreasonable. It was also a disproportionate use of resources which could have been channeled to other initiatives of crime-fighting.
The barricades around Dataran Merdeka with heavy police and FRU personnel aimed at prohibiting persons from entering the square forced large groups of people to be concentrated in the immediate vicinity of the square such as Central Market and Masjid Jamek. This caused more inconvenience to those who did not wish to be at the gathering, and strengthened the spirit of those who did.
The use of force around the areas of Masjid Jamek, Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman and Jalan Raja Laut to disperse unarmed and non-provocative crowds without prior warning was unnecessary. Deploying physical aggression and violence, and spraying chemically-laced water and tear gas are measures of last resort, not of first instance. As a result, it was unfortunate that several people were injured and many others including bystanders hurt by the chemicals in the water and gas. It is noteworthy that the authorities initiated physical force on the crowds, and caused blockades and ’stand-offs’ on the roads to prevent anyone from walking to Dataran Merdeka on to Istana Negara. Unsurprisingly however, and due to the sheer numbers of participants, the majority if not all of them found their way by different routes to the Istana Negara road.
The deployment of several police helicopters flying very low to the ground was extremely dangerous in addition to being provocative and a form of intimidation. Further, the noise the helicopters created interrupted essential communications for those who were at the gathering and the authorities on the ground.
Despite the recent introduction of section 28A of the Criminal Procedure Code, the police refused to give the Bar’s Urgent Arrest Lawyers Team access to those who were arrested and detained. No accurate and adequate information on the detainees and their grounds of arrest was forthcoming. Our lawyers had to force their way into the police station to seek further information. A police report has been lodged, and the Bar Council trusts the police will investigate the complaint immediately.
At about 11.00pm on 10 November 2007, 34 persons were arrested and released in separate batches. There were several who needed medical treatment and were sent to the hospital by our lawyers.
The Bar Council reiterates its position that citizens must be allowed the right to peacefully assemble in exercising their democratic and fundamental human right. We urge the authorities to facilitate this fundamental right of freedom of expression and assembly.
The BERSIH gathering is clear evidence (a) that attempts to block assemblies would create greater unintended chaos than had the same be facilitated to proceed expeditiously and (b) that large yet peaceful gatherings may be organised in our country without the necessity of obtaining permits from the police. This requirement in section 27 of the Police Act 1967 that permits must be given before an assembly may be held must be repealed immediately.
Ambiga Sreenevasan
President
Malaysian Bar
12 November 2007