Smart tunnel: They can only bluff the PM

This must be the joke of the century!

You don’t need to inspect the lowest level of the Smart system to know that MMC-Gamuda or the DID have not tested it for flood mitigation.

That’s not because they have admitted so but simply because they have not found a solution for desiltation.

What’s desiltation? You see, flood water being flood water, it’ s not clean. In fact, it is always full of mud (silt) and rubbish. That’s why after every flood, the biggest headache is washing the mud away (desiltation).

So, if the concessionaire or the DID really test the lowest level of the Smart system for flood mitigation, the entire level will be filled with mud. They have not thought of how to clean up the tunnels.

By now, you must have understood why they have not tested it earlier. And more so because both the inlet and outlet of the tunnels were not completed when Kuala Lumpur was hit with three flash floods all within two weeks in early June.

The authority has just announced that the entire tunnel is now completed on 23 June 2007 ( after heavy shelling by the PM one night after his new marriage). But that’s another “bullshit”. Why do I say that?

Just make a trip to Taman Desa and you would know what I mean.

They could only bluff the PM, who’s now away in Italy.

Two weeks ago, right before I went to inspect the Smart tunnel for the first time with other DAP MPs and engineers, I was having lunch at the restaurant next to the Danau Desa pond. At that point of time, the pond, which is part of the Smart system, was not ready for flood mitigation.

Even today, the pond is far from ready. It would not be ready in another 3 months according to the experts whom I have consulted.

This evening, I saw the workers were still busy widening and deepening the pond. And guess what, they have not even completed the outlet ( leaving the pond into Sg Kerayong).

Out of fear of another flash flood, as a temporary measure I guess, the contractors has just fixed some 10 GI (galvanised iron) pipes of various sizes to drain the water from the pond with the help of water pumps. Guess what, the water flows from the pond to a normal monsoon drain (only 2 feet wide by 4 feet deep) parellel to the main road, before discharging the water to a U-Culvert drains some 100 meters away. This U-Culvert drain is connected to the Sg Kerayong some distance “downstream”.

It appears to us that if there is another flash flood hitting KL in one of these days, the authority may really open up the lowest level of the Smart tunnel to test it out, and then relying on these pipes to drain the water to the normal monsoon drains (with the help of water pumps) and then to the U-Culvert drain before flowing into Sg Kerayong. So do not be too surprise if the entire road from Danau Desa to Old Klang Road area will be flooded ( the normal monsoon drains certainly could not cope with such influx of water from the pond).

Earlier, I was talking about how difficult it would be to do desiltation for the Smart tunnel. If they really open up the second level (and even the third level), imagine what would happen to the lightings, equipments and road furniture on these two levels, not forgetting about the desiltation works after the flood.

I would bet with bloggers that the authority may not have the guts to test the Smart system for water mitigation. Not even the lowest level if you asked me. Am I saying the authority may not even test the tunnnel for flood mitigation at all? You bet!

Last Saturday, at a briefing in Universiti Malaya on the Smart tunnel conducted by the DID chief , he obviously was embarrased by the DAP Cheras MP Tan Kok Wai who played the video clips (showing the massive leakages ) of the tunnel in the meeting.

Out of frustration, he made a “stupid” and irresponsible remark; he said that ” those who think the Smart tunnel was not safe, don’t use it.”

This fler also “bullshit” by saying that all the cost of building the Smart tunnel came from the concessionaire and “it’s ok ” to let them go bust!

In fact, the concessionaire only paid about RM600 million for the tunnel; the rest of the RM 1. 5 billion came from Malaysian taxpayers! If you asked me, he ‘s as arrogant as the great Samy.

Tomorrow morning at 11 am, DAP Bukit Bintang MP Fong Kui Lun will move a motion to debate on ” why the ‘Smart’ tunnel is actually not very smart”!

All the best to you, Sdr Fong.

6 Responses to “Smart tunnel: They can only bluff the PM”

  1. sampalee Says:

    This is good news.The system do not work because it is not fully completed.This is within reason.Imagine the finding that the system was completed and do not work?.There is hope yet money is not wasted[even though over spent]

  2. Wizzerd Says:

    The DID fler did what all the people in BN do all the time “deny, deny deny”..what else can he do?? No substance
    Isn’t his statement familiar to those uttered by our Semi-value minister regarding the leaks?

  3. ronnieliutiankhiew Says:


    MM2007 wrote:
    MMC WANTED A HIGHWAY TOLL CONCESSION IN THE MIDDLE OF KL. None were available. Then someone thought up this fantastic scheme to make money. It is so fantastic even the Hollywood guys cannot think this up as fiction. Only in Malaysia fact is more fantastic than fiction.
    Use the excuse of flood mitigation to make money from the Gomen. The get the Gomen to pay you of course. Then get the people to pay you of course.
    First they dreamt up this ‘fantastic’ never before done anywhere in the world idea to build a tunnel BOTH for flood water and road traffic. The flood water will flow below the road traffic. If needed the road traffic can be closed off and the flood water can even flow thru the road tunnel. Saving the city from flash floods.
    Just some small details. As Ronnie Liu has said, after each flood it will cost hundreds of thousands to jet spray the sand and silt that will clog up the tunnel.
    Also the speed of the sand, silt and debris laden flood water will destroy all the road furniture, fans, electric fittings (not to mention the short circuits and the flooded tunnel become electrified) inside the tunnel. Each time there is a flood the road furniture will have to be replaced.
    Not to worry. The ‘smart’ concessionaire already got that figured out. Here is how it goes.
    i. The Gomen pays for everything. The cost of the tunnel was put at RM1.5 billion. Actual construction cost maybe is just RM400.0 million. The concession company made RM1.1 billion untung. From this RM1.1 billion, they put back RM600.0 million as their contribution to cover the cost of the roadway. In other words they got it for free.
    Then the ‘smart’ concessionaire opened the toll road tunnel first – collecting RM2.00 each way. Money comes in.
    But the cost of maintenance of the flood tunnel is put on the Drainage & irrigation Dept (DID). Even the cost of replacing all the street furniture will be borne by the DID.
    So is this a ‘smart’ concessionaire or what ? The whole tunnel is paid for by the taxpayer. The tunnel does not work for flood mitigation. The concessionaire gets a ‘taxpayer financed’ toll road where he can collect RM2.00 from each vehicle.
    Smart concessionaire indeed.
    26/06 14:13:09

  4. shenyeeaun Says:


  5. sampalee Says:

    We can abandone the tunnel.Can we abandone the govt?.No we have to replace them[with or without a democratic system]

  6. Joker Delta Says:

    Very funny…….

    Lets hit the gomen, lets complaints, lets go and get “expert advises” (from local, international, UTM, kedai kopi, etc….)

    All these been going on and on and on. Complaint, complaint, and more complaint….

    I want to wait until the next heavy rain and see if the tunnel can do its job or not. OK, it was not ready last time. I believe so because all the press write up previously on the SMART from press conferences or interview have clearly mentioned that motorway open first, then in June the water portion. It came out in ALL papers!!! But we readers and also the ever so thrusty reporters never remember it. Pity!!

    Lets wait and se. If it fails, then we taruh them. Otherwise dont make claims and all to make one looks good, specially when the ..Ahem! is expected to be coming soon. I know…. do this so that our KPI (key performance index) look good.

    But then, what do I know? I am not the one talking to the “expert”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: