Altantuya case: DPM Najib seen with Altantuya

Najib was seen having a meal together with Altantuya in a photograph according to Mongolian witness Amy ( Burmaa Oyunchimeg). What did he say during the Ijok by-election? Didn’t he say that he has never met her? We are very proud of Karpal Singh because for his timely intervention. If not for him, we will be still in the dark about the rendezvous btween Najib and Altantuya. At the same time , we were very upset with Manoj and Tun Majid who deliberately avoided the probing. Both must be punished for this act.Najib must now explain what sort of relationship he has with Altantuya(a.k.s Amina). Both Shariibuu family and Malaysians have a right to know.

Najib seen with Altantuya

Soon Li Tsin
Jun 29, 07 11:34am
Malaysiakini
A Mongolian witness caused a stir in court today when she revealed that murdered Mongolian national Altantuya Shaariibuu had been photographed having a meal with a Malaysian government official named Najib Razak.Burmaa Oyunchimeg (left), also known as Amy, told the Shah Alam High Court that Altantuya had shown her the photo in Hong Kong when she returned from a trip to France.It is believed that the government official in the photograph is Deputy Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak, who has close ties with political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda.The latter has been charged with abetting the murder of Altantuya, 28.Najib has previously denied that he had personally met the murdered woman and that he heard of her only from newspaper reports after Altantuya was murdered.This morning, Burmaa, 26, had mentioned the photograph when re-examined by DPP Manoj Kurup.Manoj was asking whether she had personal knowledge of Altantuya’s disappearance.Burmaa began her answer conveyed by her translator Enkhjargal Tsetsgee that she knew Altantuya had come to see Razak who happens to be the only person she knows in Malaysia.

“I know why she wanted to see Razak Baginda, I have seen pictures of Altantuya with Razak and a government official,” she said.

However, Manoj quizzed her as to how she knew Altantuya disappeared and did not follow up with Burmaa’s sudden revelation.

About 20 minutes later, lawyer Karpal Singh, who is holding a watching brief for the deceased’s family, sought permission from the court to pose a question on the photograph.

‘They had the same name’

This drew protests from the prosecution and a verbal exchange ensued on the relevance of the question. However, judge Mohd Zaki Mohd Yasin granted Karpal permission.

The veteran lawyer then proceeded to ask Burmaa on what was depicted in the photograph.

“She (Altantuya) was having a meal at a round table with Razak (Baginda), a Malaysian government official and other people,” she replied.

Karpal then asked her on the identity of the government official, and she replied: “I remember the name Najib Razak, they had the same name, ‘Razak’. I thought they were brothers. I asked her (Altantuya) if they were brothers.”

This sparked off another exchange between the prosecution and Karpal before the judge dismissed Burmaa and directed the courtroom to stand down for 15 minutes.

The next witness was lance corporal Rohaniza Roslan, 29, who had testified that the red Proton Wira aeroback – which was seen by Razak’s private investigator P Balasubramaniam as the car that took Altantuya away on Oct 19 last year – belonged to her.

Examined by DPP Noorin Badaruddin, Rohaniza said she was off duty that night and was keeping Azilah company at the police headquarters in Bukit Aman.

She and Azilah were a couple at that time.

“Azilah had an assignment to escort the PM and DPM to Hong Kong but it was cancelled. So I was there to help him unpack his belongings,” she said.

Rohaniza elaborated that Azilah received a call and later followed him to Bukit Damansara. She said she saw an Indian man talking to a “Chinese woman”.

She told the court that she then moved to the back seat and the Chinese woman sat next to her.

‘Don’t create trouble’ 

According to Rohaniza, a man in a green cap then showed up, entered the car and Azilah drove them away before dropping the man off at a junction nearby.

“He got out of my car, went into a green (Suzuki) Vitara and Azilah tailed him to a highway towards the direction of Bukit Aman.

“It was then the Chinese woman asked us who we were and Azilah told her “police”,” the Petaling Jaya-based officer told Noorin.

She said Azilah told the Chinese woman not to create trouble at Razak’s house because he has a family at home and that she should find Razak at his office instead.

Rohaniza who was tearing when she was asked to point Azilah out as she revealed that she has known Azilah since 1998 when she joined the police force.

Two police officers – Azilah, 30, and corporal Sirul Azhar Umar, 35 – are charged with the murder of Altantuya. Razak, 47, is charged with abetting them.

Prosecutors allege that Abdul Razak and Altantuya met in 2004 and began a whirlwind affair, during which he gave her money.

After they broke up a year later, he allegedly continued to give her money whenever she demanded. But the payments stopped last year, prompting her to become dissatisfied and travel to Malaysia in October, the prosecution said.

Altantuya was killed by ‘probable blast-related’ injuries in a clearing in Shah Alam after she was driven away from outside Abdul Razak’s house in mid-October.

All three accused faced the death penalty.

“阿尔丹杜雅曾与纳吉共餐”
布尔玛供词与纳吉声明有出入
■日期/Jun 29, 2007   ■时间/12:17:12 pm
■新闻/家国风云   ■作者/merdekareview曾薛霏
           
【本刊曾薛霏撰述】副首相纳吉名字在沙亚南法院中响起!“炸尸案”死者阿尔丹杜雅(Altantuya Shaariibuu)的堂妹布尔玛(Burmaa Oyunchimeg)今日继续供证,阿尔丹杜雅曾向她出示一张照片,图片中的人包括阿尔丹杜雅、第三被告拉萨巴金德和一个政府高官。她稍后向法庭表示,照片中的政府高官是纳吉拉萨(Najib Razak)。此惊人揭露让“炸尸案”审讯案透出其“政治”气息,主控官阿都马吉(Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah)却指照片与案情无关,与辩护律师一起反对卡巴星盘问证人。

布尔玛(右图)今日接受主控官马诺(Manoj Kurup)盘问时,答非所问,忽然爆出她知道阿尔丹杜雅来马的原因,是要找第三被告阿都拉萨,因为阿尔丹杜雅并没有认识其他马来西亚人。而且更指她曾看过一张阿尔丹杜雅的照片,照片中有阿尔丹杜雅、阿都拉萨和政府高官。

当布尔玛供证到这里时,遭到主控官马诺打断。主控官认为布尔玛没有回答他的问题,打断她的回答,然后继续发问其他问题。

布尔玛也强调,在2005年8月时,阿尔丹杜雅和阿都拉萨的关系还存在,因为她知道两人曾结伴一同去欧洲的法国和意大利旅行。根据主控官开庭陈词,阿尔丹杜雅和阿都拉萨是在2004年认识,不过两人在2005年8月已经分手。

阿都马吉与卡巴星争论

当旁听律师卡巴星要透过法庭盘问证人有关照片一事时,主控官阿都马吉起来反对,理由是:“此事与案情无关”(Irrelevant)。

法官和主控官同时表示他们并没有抄到这一段。而证人这时也举手告诉法庭她确实说过有关照片的事情。再度获得第一被告辩护律师和主控官的强烈反对。尔后,法官准许卡巴星通过法庭盘问证人。

阿尔丹杜雅从法国回来后,直接去香港探望她时,向她出示在欧洲旅游的照片,其中一张照片是一个圆桌的聚餐会,图中有阿尔丹杜雅、阿都拉萨、一名政府高官和其他人。家属旁听律师卡巴星(Karpal Singh)透过法院盘问布尔玛:“你是否知道这名政府高官?”

这时,主控官阿都马吉(右图)再度站起来,指“此事与案情无关”Irrelevant)。

卡巴星表示,在第三被告的宣誓供诉书中指出,副首相的首席保镖下令随从带走死者。

法官随后询问卡巴星当家属旁听律师的目的是不是为了政治目的,卡巴星回答说,我们要确保审讯没有任何隐瞒。他身为家属旁听律师,就必须确保真相大白。辩护律师指卡巴星指导证人供证

第一被告辩护律师不满意卡巴星作出这样的指控,并表示如果卡巴星可以这样断言,他也可以断言卡巴星指导证人供证(coaching the witness)。卡巴星随后要哈兹曼收回这个说法。不过哈兹曼坚持不肯。

阿都马吉表示:“我们不是来这里把法庭变成一个政治论坛。这里是法庭,你可以去国会做这些事情,但你必须尊重法庭,检察署会确保每个人获得公平的审讯。我们的工作是要真相大白。”

过后,法官不允许卡巴星继续盘问证人。他也表示不会针对卡巴星和哈兹曼的主张下命令。不过,会把照片的供词记录在案。布尔玛曾在去年10月21日发出手机短讯给控方第一证人巴拉苏巴马廉(Balasubramaniam),她也在昨天承认是一则恐吓短讯,但今天在庭上,她否认了昨天承认恐吓巴拉的供词,并指她其实不明白第三被告辩护律师王健强的问题。【点击:死者堂妹承认发短讯恐吓巴拉 四恐吓字条乃阿尔丹杜雅笔迹】

她供证时表示,自己是在极度生气的情况下发出这则短讯,因为她很担心堂姐阿尔丹杜雅的安危,而当她致电给巴拉时,巴拉只说阿尔丹杜雅乘搭德士走了,当她欲进一步发问时,巴拉就终止了两人的谈话。

布尔玛今天正式供证完毕。她在步出法庭时,对媒体发言表示自己会就哈兹曼指卡巴星指导她供证的指控,报警。

纳吉:我不认识阿尔丹杜雅

在今年四月雪兰莪依约区(Ijok)州议席补选期间,前副首相安华依布拉欣在“炸尸案”课题上向与三名被告都有关的纳吉左右开弓,并在4月21日一场政治演说中公开质问纳吉是否认识阿尔丹杜雅。

在另一厢,替国阵候选人竞选拉票的纳吉(左图)则回应,指自己根本就不认识阿尔旦杜雅,也从来没有见过阿尔旦杜雅,而他也和其他人民一样,在发生炸尸案后,才第一次在报章上看到阿尔旦杜雅的照片。【点击《中国报》:纳吉:“我根本不认识她” 警方调查证明无关】 

本案件自开审以来,审讯、媒体报道皆以“桃色情杀案”为导向。然而,早前向高等法院申请退出为“炸尸案”首被告抗辩的律师朱基菲里诺丁(Zulkifli Nordin),曾向《国际先驱论坛报》透露,辨方有意传召副首相兼国防部长纳吉出庭供证,交代他和首被告、首席警长阿兹拉哈德里(Azilah Hadri)会面的事。

此外,朱基菲里(右图)原本也要在法院揭露“炸尸案”死者阿尔丹杜雅莎莉布在2002年的一宗法国潜水艇采购案里扮演的角色。

朱基菲里对《国际先驱论坛报》(International Herald Tribune)说:“我们有兴趣知道,这宗谋杀案当中有没有政治联系(political link)。为什么所有涉案者都和第二号人物有关联?”朱基菲里所谓的“第二号人物”是指副首相兼国防部长、巫统署理主席纳吉(Najib Tun Razak)。【点击:质疑三嫌犯都与纳吉有关联  前辩护律师有意传副揆供证】

5 Responses to “Altantuya case: DPM Najib seen with Altantuya”

  1. ronnieliutiankhiew Says:

    Najib denied knowing Altantuya during the Ijok by-election. here’s The China Pressreport.

    納吉:“我根本不認識她”
    警方調查證明無關

    (依約21日訊)副首相拿督斯里納吉今晚鄭重否認他與“蒙古女郎炸屍案”有關,粉碎所有指他與此案有關的傳言。
    “警方已經對此案做出調查,能夠證明我與這起案件毫無關係,上蒼也可以做證,證明我的清白。”

    納吉是今晚出席甘榜武吉巴東出席人民交流晚宴,在致詞時發表上述談話。

    上蒼證明清白

    雪州州務大臣拿督斯里莫哈末基爾、巫青團副團長凱里、巫統宣傳主任丹斯里莫哈末泰益及國陣候選人巴迪班,也有出席。

    副首相說,他本人根本就不認識阿旦杜雅,也從來沒有見過阿旦杜雅,而他也和其他人民一樣,在發生炸屍案后,才第一次在報章上看到阿旦杜雅的照片。

    他指出,這件事是涉及他的朋友,他對于事情的始末並不了解,因為他不可能可以了解一個人的一切事情,即使是旺阿茲莎也不了解安華做過的所有事情。

    副揆說,公正黨一直利用“蒙古女郎炸屍案”做出人身攻擊,這是對他一項毀謗,這是非常不道德的行為。

    不做出人身攻擊

    “如果要做出人身攻擊我也可以,我知道更多有關安華的事,因為警察及政府官員都有向我匯報了許多關于他的事,但我會顧全他的妻子兒女,不願做出傷害他人的事。”

    他也指責公正黨不該將這些無關依約補選的課題,例如“蒙古女郎炸屍案”帶到依約,依約選民真正關心的事,是地方上的建設及未來的發展。

    “公正黨如果認為這些案件有問題,大可以將案件帶上法庭,而不是將這些課題帶到依約補選,我不會害怕這些指責,因為我是清白的。”

  2. alaycia Says:

    where’s the photo linking najib to altantuya? is dis a scam??

  3. SELENDANG MERAH Says:

    if you can’t prove, produce & identify DPM in the picture, then ITS TIME WE KICK OUT ALL RUBBISH NATIONAL TRAITOR out of this country!!!!!

  4. sambo Says:

    She don´t have a chance to do it Selendang Merah! Court will not allow her to do it. Even Karpal cannot ask too much question about this “photo”….

  5. Escorts in Delhi Says:

    Escorts in Delhi…

    […]Altantuya case: DPM Najib seen with Altantuya « Colour-blind[…]…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: